View Full Version : Tennis Poker - Australian Open values
DoctorG Jan 16th, 2002, 01:30 AM A: Capriati
K: Hingis
Q: Clijsters
J: Seles
10: Mauresmo, V.Williams
9: Henin
8: Grande, Maleeva, Coetzer
7: Dementieva, Weingartner
6: Daniilidou, Hantuchova, Tanasugarn, Schiavone
5: Dechy, Shaughnessy, Farina-Elia, Serna, Raymond, Sugiyama, Schett, Tulyaganova
4: Tu, Schwartz, Majoli, Martinez, Lamade
3: Panova, Kremer, Bedanova
2: Kruger, Molik, Stevenson, Bovina, Montolio, Likhovtseva, McQuillan, Nola, Sanchez-Vicario, Suarez, Kournikova, Krasnoroutskaya, Leon-Garcia, Torrens-Valero, Nagyova, Ruano-Pascual, Schnyder, Kapros, Testud, Mikaelian, Pierce
-: Davenport, Dokic, Petrova, Rubin, S.Williams, Zuluaga
DoctorG Jan 16th, 2002, 01:32 AM I thought it would have been a good idea to have a brief reminder of how a score is assigned to the tennis player according to her tournament performance: round by round I will explain in detail what I do to determine the card values. :)
59 different players are involved in the Tennis Poker first leg.
6 of them are not playing the Australian Open, so they don’t get any score:
<font color=tomato><b>-: Davenport, Dokic, Petrova, Rubin, S.Williams, Zuluaga</b></font>
21 players have already lost in the 1st round. This is quite simple: <b><font color=lime>first round losers always score a 2</font></b>:
<font color=tomato><b>2: Kruger, Molik, Stevenson, Bovina, Montolio, Likhovtseva, McQuillan, Nola, Sanchez-Vicario, Suarez, Kournikova, Krasnoroutskaya, Leon-Garcia, Torrens-Valero, Nagyova, Ruano-Pascual, Schnyder, Kapros, Testud, Mikaelian, Pierce. </b></font>
32 players reached the 2nd round. In Grand Slam events, a second round is worth a value of 3 or 4, according to the position in the draw. We will see what happens in Melbourne in the next two days. :)
DoctorG Jan 17th, 2002, 10:00 PM Players who lose in the second round get a value of 3 or 4 according to their draw position.
General rule: considering two tennis players who were beaten in the same round, <b><font color=lime>the player who lost in the draw section of a higher seed gets a higher value.</font></b> It’s the position which matters; not the seed herself, who may have already lost or may be just the player we’re giving the value.
In GS events (and all the events with draws of 128):
4 is the value which is given for the seeds #1 - #16 draw sections.
3 is the value which is given for the seeds #17 - #32 draw sections.
DoctorG Jan 17th, 2002, 10:02 PM Let’s see what happened at the Australian Open. :)
2nd round losers:
Meilen Tu, Tatiana Panova, Barbara Schwartz, Iva Majoli, Conchita Martinez, Anne Kremer, Daja Bedanova and Bianka Lamade.
Tu was beaten by Jennifer Capriati, the first seed => 4: Tu
Panova was the 29th seed => 3: Panova
Schwartz lost to #4 seed Kim Clijsters => 4: Schwartz
Majoli beat Sanchez-Vicario in the first round and Arantxa was the 14th seed => 4: Majoli
Conchita beat in the frst round Lina K, who replaced Serena Williams, seeded #6 => 4: Martinez
Kremer herself was the 28th seed => 3: Kremer
Bedanova herself was the 21st seed => 3: Bedanova
Lamade lost to Dechy, who beat Sandrine Testud, the 9th seed => 4: Lamade
Australian Open values:
<b><font color=tomato>
4: Tu, Schwartz, Majoli, Martinez, Lamade
3: Panova, Kremer, Bedanova
</font></b>
In the third round we’re left with 24 of your players: everyone in the last 32 but Watson, Husarova, Pratt, Carlsson, Sucha, Adr Serra-Zanetti, Rittner and Medina-Garrigues. A value of 5 is guaranteed, but they may score a 6 if they are in the draw section of a high seed. We’ll see everything in detail in two days time. :)
DoctorG Jan 17th, 2002, 10:06 PM With smaller tournaments, the basic principle remains the same. :)
Draws of 64:
4 is the value which is given for the seeds #1 - #8 draw sections.
3 is the value which is given for the seeds #9 - #16 draw sections.
Draws of 32:
6 is the value which is given for the seeds #1 - #2 draw sections.
5 is the value which is given for the seeds #3 - #4 draw sections.
4 is the value which is given for the seeds #5 - #6 draw sections.
3 is the value which is given for the seeds #7 - #8 draw sections.
Example. :)
Sydney main draw included 32 tennis players (with 4 first round byes).
Seeds:
1 - Capriati
2 - Hingis
3 - Clijsters
4 - Serena Williams
5 - Henin
6 - Mauresmo
7 - Testud
8 - Shaughnessy
2nd round losers:
Capriati, the first seed herself => 6
Hantuchova lost to Shaughnessy (8) => 3
Kournikova lost Serena Williams (4) => 5
Coetzer lost to Mauresmo (6) => 4
Martinez lost to Henin (5) => 4
Farina-Elia lost to Clijsters (3) => 5
Nagyova lost to Testud (7) => 3
Raymond lost to Hingis (2) => 6
<b>
6: Capriati, Raymond
5: Farina-Elia, Kournikova
4: Martinez, Coetzer
3: Nagyova, Hantuchova
DoctorG Jan 20th, 2002, 01:30 AM Exactly a half of those 24 players have lost in the 3rd round and score a value of:
6, if they are in the draw sections of seeds #1 - #8
5, if they are in the draw sections of seeds #9 - #16
3rd round losers:
Daniilidou, Tulyaganova, Shaughnessy, Tanasugarn, Sugiyama, Serna, Farina-Elia, Schett, Schiavone, Dechy, Raymond, Hantuchova.
Let’s see the results from another perspective, starting from the seeds and not from the players. :)
DoctorG Jan 20th, 2002, 01:32 AM <b>Scoring a 6:</b>
1 - Jennifer Capriati, beat <b>Daniilidou</b> in the 3rd round
2 - Venus Williams, beat <b>Hantuchova</b> in the 3rd round
3 - Martina Hingis, beat Rittner in the 3rd round
4 - Kim Clijsters, beat Watson in the 3rd round
5 - Serena Williams, replaced by Lina K, who was beaten by Conchita Martinez, who was defeated by Carlsson-Svensson in the 3rd round
6 - Justine Henin, beat Pratt in the third round
7 - Amelie Mauresmo, beat <b>Tanasugarn</b> in the 3rd round
8 - Monica Seles, beat <b>Schiavone</b> in the 3rd round.
Considering that Rittner, Watson, Carlsson-Svensson and Pratt were not chosen, the result is:
<b><font color=tomato>6: Daniilidou, Hantuchova, Tanasugarn, Schiavone</font></b>
DoctorG Jan 20th, 2002, 01:35 AM <b>Scoring a 5:</b>
9 - Sandrine Testud, defeated by <b>Dechy</b> in the first round
10 - Meghann <b>Shaughnessy</b> herself, beaten by Weingartner in the third round
11 - Silvia <b>Farina-Elia</b> herself, beaten by Adriana Serra-Zanetti
12 - Elena Dementieva, defeated <b>Serna</b> in the 3rd round
13 - Maggie Maleeva, beat <b>Raymond</b> in the 3rd round
14 - Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, out in the 1st round against Majoli, who was beaten in the following round by Husarova, winner over <b>Sugiyama</b> in round 3
15 - Amanda Coetzer, beat <b>Schett</b> in the 3rd round
16 - Iroda <b>Tulyaganova</b> herself, out in the third round against Rita Grande
<b><font color=tomato>5: Dechy, Shaughnessy, Farina-Elia, Serna, Raymond, Sugiyama, Schett, Tulyaganova</font></b>
arn Jan 20th, 2002, 04:38 PM thanX for all the efforts you make :)
DoctorG Jan 20th, 2002, 05:53 PM Arn,
thank you for your interest and support! :)
DoctorG Jan 21st, 2002, 02:51 PM You included in your combinations 12 out of the last 16 players. Husarova, Sucha, Adr Serra-Zanetti and Medina-Garrigues were the other four. :)
In a Grand Slam event a 4th round makes players score:
8, if they are in the draw sections of seeds #1 - #4
7, if they are in the draw sections of seeds #5 - #8
DoctorG Jan 21st, 2002, 02:53 PM <b><font color=dodgerblue>Scoring a 8:</font></b>
<b>Rita Grande</b> was defeated by the 1st seed Jennifer Capriati
<b>Maggie Maleeva</b> lost to the 2nd seed Venus Williams
<b>Amanda Coetzer</b> has been beaten by the 3rd seed Martina Hingis
Husarova collected only 2 games against the 4th seed Kim Clijsters
<b><font color=tomato>8: Grande, Maleeva, Coetzer</font></b>
DoctorG Jan 21st, 2002, 02:57 PM <b><font color=dodgerblue>Scoring a 7:</font></b>
Sucha beat Carlsson-Svensson who beat Conchita Martinez who beat Lina Krasnoroutskaya who replaced the 5th seed Serena Williams. :D
<b>Elena Dementieva </b>lost to the 6th seed Justine Henin
<b>Marlene Weingartner </b>beaten by the 7th seed Amelie Mauresmo
Medina-Garrigues was forced to retire against the 8th seed Monica Seles.
<b><font color=tomato>7: Dementieva, Weingartner</font></b>
DoctorG Jan 21st, 2002, 03:54 PM In Grand Slam events, the players who lose in the quarterfinals are given a value of:
10, if they are in the draw quarters of seeds #1 - #2
9, if they are in the draw quarters of seeds #3 - #4
<b><font color=lime>The scores for the four semifinalists are always the same</font></b>, no matter what the tournament tier or the draw size is:
J: Bottom half Semifinalist
Q: Top half Semifinalist
K: Runner-up
A: Winner
So, the most important values should be quite easy to spot. :)
DoctorG Jan 21st, 2002, 03:56 PM You picked all the 8 Australian Open quarterfinalists except Adriana Serra-Zanetti. :)
<b><font color=dodgerblue>Martina Hingis, Venus Williams</font></b> had already won a title. No matter what their Australian Open final outcome is, they will score an Ace at the end of the first leg.
This leaves us with 5 players.
<b><font color=dodgerblue>Jennifer Capriati, Amelie Mauresmo</font></b>
In Sydney, 7 for Amelie (quarterfinalist) and 6 for Jennifer (second round loser). They’re facing each other in the #1 seed draw quarter, and the one who lose will score a 10. If the winner of this clash loses in the semis, she will score a Q.
<b><font color=dodgerblue>Kim Clijsters</font></b>
A J for her semifinal in Sydney, a Q for a possible semifinal at the Australian Open.
<b><font color=dodgerblue>Justine Henin</font></b>
Justine was the Gold Coast runner-up, so she has already scored a K and she can better her value only winning the tournament.
<b><font color=dodgerblue>Monica Seles</font></b>
No warm up events for Monica, the Australian Open value will be her first score. A loss in the quarters against the #2 seed Venus Williams would be worth a 10. If she’s defeated in the semis she will get a J.
per4ever Jan 22nd, 2002, 11:18 PM I read this thread each time you post DoctorG..and I still don't understand the meaning of this game :rolleyes:
But you are doing a hell of a job :D
DoctorG Jan 22nd, 2002, 11:30 PM Per4ever,
thank you for your interest. If you have a particular question, I'll be glad to answer. :)
Anyway, be sure many posters are successful in this game without having the slightest idea of what they are doing. :D
DoctorG Jan 23rd, 2002, 04:34 PM <b><font color=dodgerblue>Scoring a 10:</font></b>
<b>Amelie Mauresmo</b>, beaten by Jennifer Capriati, seed #1.
<b>Venus Williams</b>, seed #2.
<b><font color=tomato>10: Mauresmo, V.Williams</font></b>
<b><font color=dodgerblue>Scoring a 9:</font></b>
Serra-Zanetti, defeated by Martina Hingis, seed #3
<b>Justine Henin</b>, beaten by Kim Clisters, seed #4
<b><font color=tomato>9: Henin</font></b>
Venus and Justine had already scored better results anyway. :)
DoctorG Jan 24th, 2002, 09:14 PM <b><font color=dodgerblue>Scoring a Q:</font>
Kim Clijsters</b>, semifinalist in the top half, with seed #1 Jennifer Capriati.
<b><font color=dodgerblue>Scoring a J:</font>
Monica Seles</b>, semifinalist in the bottom half, with seed #2 Venus Williams
<b><font color=tomato>Q: Clijsters
J: Seles</font></b>
Adrian Jan 26th, 2002, 05:08 AM mmm..I think I'm doing okay :confused:
Thanks Doc :D
DoctorG Jan 26th, 2002, 04:29 PM Much better than your exhibition performance, but at this stage not good enough to qualify for the main draw. Still two weeks to better your result though. :)
DoctorG Jan 26th, 2002, 04:33 PM <b><font color=dodgerblue>Scoring an A:</font>
Jennifer Capriati</b>, the winner.
<b><font color=dodgerblue>Scoring a K:</font>
Martina Hingis</b>, the runner-up.
<b><font color=tomato>A: Capriati
K: Hingis</font></b>
Adrian Jan 26th, 2002, 04:43 PM I knew that :rolleyes:
Tokyo is it then :bounce: :bounce: .........a slight :kiss: for the judge...you never know ;)
Adrian Jan 26th, 2002, 04:49 PM Okay...now this was my team...
Henin / Hingis / Tulyaganova / S.Williams / Zuluaga
I had molik for a spare?
Take Henin out, replace her with Dokic, remove Zualaga and replace her with Molik, remove Serena and replace her with Arantxa..
Can I do that?
DoctorG Jan 27th, 2002, 06:26 PM Adrian,
you had Molik and Sugiyama as spare cards; Ai has a better value at this moment and so it will be her to replace the scoreless Zuluaga in your combination. :)
Your new team is:
Dokic / Hingis / Molik / Sanchez-Vicario / Tulyaganova
I've updated your choices in the other thread. Of course these replacements will take effect as soon as the second leg starts. :)
Thank you, good luck! :wavey:
Adrian Jan 27th, 2002, 11:12 PM Thats all good :D
Adrian Jan 29th, 2002, 08:23 AM mmm..sorry about this, but something has just crystalised..(it happens occassionally)...Forget those changes for now, will review it at the end of this leg..sorry for mucking you around :(
DoctorG Jan 29th, 2002, 04:09 PM No problem, I've restored your old team. You can make all the changes you would like to before February 10th. :)
|
|