jonny84
May 19th, 2008, 06:29 PM
Hi, here is the place to voice suggestions, opinions and discussion about Q-Ball!
|
View Full Version : Q-Ball: Discussion & Suggestions Thread jonny84 May 19th, 2008, 06:29 PM Hi, here is the place to voice suggestions, opinions and discussion about Q-Ball! Gigi. May 19th, 2008, 07:42 PM I would advice adding an ITF also weekly. :) jonny84 May 19th, 2008, 07:54 PM I would advice adding an ITF also weekly. :) Cool. Something to consider. How about having a Q-Ball for the 50k, 75k and 100k events? Gigi. May 19th, 2008, 08:19 PM If you don't mind the scorings n stuff, of course. :) jonny84 May 19th, 2008, 08:26 PM If you don't mind the scorings n stuff, of course. :) No. You think we should have a different point system for ITFs (i.e. not as many) or keep it the same? Will do it but maybe trial it later in the year and just stick to WTA events until the uni term is over....so maybe after Wimbledon ;) Gigi. May 19th, 2008, 08:28 PM Ok, as you wish. :cool: Y.J.CHANfan May 20th, 2008, 03:44 AM I have a different view. I prefer it to stick to WTA. Because you have to take it into account that even some qualifications of WTA are enough unpredictable and unfamiliar to people. (like in Istanbul) What would happen in the ITF?Most of the qualies of ITF are a gathering of the unknown. Plus what specific tournament are you choosing then if there are 2 or more with equally highest prize money?If you'd pick an European event,the names in the draw could be so uknown to Asian posters,likewise,if you'd pick an Asian event,the qualifiers could look all Greek to the European.And it loses the fun and the meaning of this game:guess who the qualifiers are and who they beat in the final round of qualifying through analysing the draw. These are my advice. :) But you are the one to decide.This is a cool game. :cool: jonny84 May 20th, 2008, 10:57 AM Also decided to increase the points of Grand Slam events a little - suggestion from strastib. Gigi. May 28th, 2008, 06:40 PM I was thinking... 1) Wouldn't it be better if we PMed the picks so that there is no attempt of compying picks from top players? :) 2) Maybe we could make sth like doubles, 2 players team up, their result is added and the winner is made. :shrug: jonny84 May 29th, 2008, 01:44 PM I was thinking... 1) Wouldn't it be better if we PMed the picks so that there is no attempt of compying picks from top players? :) I can see what you mean, but it is a lot easier to total up the points by just looking up one thread. Hopefully there is no copying anyway - it is just the same as FITD, Suicide Tennis, etc where people post in the same thread. Catriel Jul 15th, 2008, 05:22 PM I love this game, specially because jonny has made it all by himself :worship: jonny84 Jul 16th, 2008, 12:38 PM I love this game, specially because jonny has made it all by himself :worship: Thanks Catriel. Glad you enjoy the game. Gigi. Jul 16th, 2008, 05:14 PM Yes, another :worship: to you, Jonny. :) jonny84 Jul 18th, 2008, 03:39 PM Thanks everyone for still playing. I think that from next year maybe we will incorporate doubles into it as well. But I think that everyone should stick to the same partner for a minimum of three weeks or so. I have been looking at the ITFs and its tricky as results of ITF matches can be hard to come by and as Y.J.CHANfan has said some players are too obscure. |